March 10, 2021

Study to investigate atheists’ stigmatization, well-being


Research shows that U.S. atheists frequently experience social stigmas.

The religiously unaffiliated, including atheists, are the fastest-growing (non-)religious population in the United States. But the social stigma associated with atheism can leave the population vulnerable to isolation and poor mental health outcomes.

Dena Abbott, assistant professor of counseling psychology, is using a one-year Research Council grant to investigate the psychological well-being of two groups of atheists — rural-residing and woman-identified atheists — in the context of anti-atheist discrimination in the United States.

Abbott notes that research on atheism is scarce. Few studies have examined atheists’ psychological well-being, she said, leading to uncertainty among mental health practitioners about how to practice with and advocate for the population.

“One question I get a lot is about how often atheists actually experience discrimination,” said Abbott, a research affiliate at the Nebraska Center for Research on Children, Youth, Families and Schools. “Research suggests that it is quite frequently.”

Abbott is aiming to increase awareness of the stigmas that atheists often face, along with how discrimination against them can be detrimental to their careers and relationships. Her research will examine the relationships between atheists’ psychological well-being and several factors, including atheist identity, atheist outness, discrimination and microaggressions.

“How important your identity feels to you — and the amount of discrimination you experience or internalize — has implications for your psychological well-being and happiness, as well as mental health and psychological distress,” she said.

As part of the project, Abbott is recruiting 500 participants from across the United States via Reddit and other websites, national secular organizations and an atheist research collaborative of which she is a part.

Participant surveys will be used to collect data on both microaggressions and overt discrimination that participants have experienced. They will also be asked about their psychological stress and well-being — their anxious or depressive experiences, but also their strengths.

As a counseling psychologist, Abbott is interested in how she can apply her findings with her clients — and how to help other psychologists work with non-religious clients. Filling the void of atheism studies in psychology, she said, can inform mental health practice and advocacy.

“There is discrimination, and unique consequences of that discrimination,” Abbott said. “But there are also psychological strengths atheists possess, which mental health professionals may be able to lean into and help non-religious people feel more fulfilled.”